All Posts

Up to 70% of jobs are never advertised. If networking fills you with dread, reframe it: be curious, be generous, make it easy to help you. A simple five-step framework to get started.

The most common reason candidates tell me they're ready to move isn't salary or title - it's the lack of growth. The teams that double down on development win and keep great people.

Caution isn't the same as loyalty. Strong candidates are still movable in an uncertain market; the bar is just much higher. Employers who misread stability as loyalty are in for a surprise.

The headline numbers look strong, but if you work in marketing, digital or creative it doesn't feel like a boom. The real disconnect, for hiring managers and jobseekers alike, comes down to clarity.

The capability gap will show up in performance first. But there's a second risk: top professionals notice when an employer is slowing their growth. A weak approach to AI can become a dealbreaker.

AI is reshaping demand faster than anyone expected, and highly qualified people are getting silence. The differentiator now is what AI can't replicate: communication, trust, empathy and judgment.

From CV screening to virtual recruiters, AI now runs most of the process, and the cracks are showing on both sides. Where should we add the human check, and how do we balance efficiency with trust?

When AI makes everyone sound like the perfect candidate, how do you tell who actually fits? Why forward-thinking businesses are redesigning assessment around real problem-solving, not polished answers.

Companies are still hiring, just far more deliberately. If you're looking for work right now, here's what's actually working - from targeted applications to staying visible and moving fast.

"You need more experience" has become the safest reason to reject someone, not the most accurate. When a team can't define success, they fall back on titles, degrees and years. Here's the better question.

It has never been easier to apply, or harder to assess. The advantage in 2026 isn't reach - it's disciplined qualification. Here's how I tighten the front end of the hiring process.

Career changers, side projects, tool fluency, curious thinkers, stakeholder experience. Five things worth more than a tidy job title when you're hiring people who will actually make an impact.

A bad hire slows delivery, drains morale and pushes your best people to breaking point. Easily $10K to $30K, and the opportunity cost is higher. Hiring fast feels like progress; hiring well protects the business.

Experience and track record are useful, but they're not the same as future performance. Define what success looks like in 12 months first, then build the brief, search and assessment around it.

Hiring for strategic outcomes, not just filling seats. With applications at record highs, speed and clarity make the difference: tighten the brief, move fast on standout talent, keep the process human.

Promoting your best performer into management can cost you twice: you lose a strong individual contributor and create a manager who was never designed for the job. Usually it's role design, not the person.

When every candidate is "good, but...", the shortlist usually isn't the problem. It's that nobody got specific about what success in the role looks like before the search began.

Someone capable joins, leaves 6 to 12 months later, leadership blames the market and runs the hire again. But if nothing inside the role changes, the cycle just repeats.

A business pays a large fee the moment the contract is signed, then finds out months later whether the hire worked. Here's why I spread the fee across the first year and share the risk.

Running the whole process yourself feels cheaper and safer. But the real cost isn't the recruiter - it's the mis-hire, the stalled offer, and the role you have to fill twice.